Marriage Equality
PAGE RETAINED FOR HISTORICAL
INTEREST. NOT AN ISSUE AFTER 9/12/2017 when marriage
equality became law and the legal requirement changed
so that I had to say "Marriage, according to law in
Australia, is the union of TWO PEOPLE, to the
exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for
life"
In most of the legal wedding ceremonies I perform, the
couple asks me to make a statement about their personal
belief in marriage equality to counter the statement
about marriage being between a man and a woman which the
Marriage Act requires me to include in the ceremony
before the couple makes their vows. This is something
have been offering couples from the very first marriage
ceremony I performed. As an ally it is extremely
important to me to be able to do this.
As an ally it is
extremely important to me to be able to do this, and
to support and advocate for marriage equality in
numerous other ways.
The history of marriage laws in Australia. It is very
interesting that, at the time the1961 Marriage Act (the
one that transferred marriage from individual state
jurisdiction to the Commonwealth) was promulgated
Senator John Gorton said: "I am inclined to think that
the reason why marriage has not been defined previously
in legislation of this kind is because it is rather
difficult to do so. Marriage, of course, can mean a
number of things. For instance, it can mean a religious
ceremony; it can mean a civil ceremony; and it can mean
a form of living together. There are several meanings
covered by the word 'marriage', which are quite
different one from the other" (Senate Hansard 18 April
1961, p. 544).
He then went on to say: "I want to make it clear that
the fact of the celebrant saying those words, which
clause 46 requires him to say, does not have the force
of law to define a marriage in the sense in which the
insertion of a definition ... would have (Senate Hansard
18 April 1961, p. 544.)
As we know, the Marriage Amendment Act 2004 inserted the
definition into Subsection 5(1) and in doing so, as
Rodney Croome argues in his article in Overland (well
worth reading), added yet another chapter to the
shameful history of governments in this country
manipulating who ordinary people marry in order to
engineer broader visions of what Australian society
should be. This history goes back to the earliest times.
The following quote from that article is one I'm going
to be suggesting be included in statements of personal
belief in future:
"Just as freedom to marry frees gays and lesbians to be
fully human, so it also frees marriage to be ‘fully
marriage’."
NB, not all of the links below are still live.
http://www.australianmarriageequality.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Marriage-Equality_Book.pdf